Contact us
Uncategorized

Consumers confused on Olympic sponsors

I love the essence of the olympics, certainly enjoying the national pride and incredible sporting stories, but I believe that the Olympics is now too commercial, corporate and tightly controlled. Is being associated with the olympics still an exciting proposition for consumers?

Every category has a sponsor and from a us survey appearing in Ad Age it appears the public believe Pepsi, Burger King and Nike are all sponsors. Controversially while athletes can not engage with non Olympic sponsors Nike have managed to sponsor the US team. Can brands drive enough value from association with the olympics as a brand platform, i.e. outside of hospitality deals, ability to gain additional feature in retail, or opportunity for additional coverage at venues? As a brand proposition I believe this is becoming harder to justify. If you don’t believe look at the traction that the Nike greatness campaign is gaining.

Leave a Reply

Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
Youtube
Consent to display content from - Youtube
Vimeo
Consent to display content from - Vimeo
Google Maps
Consent to display content from - Google
Spotify
Consent to display content from - Spotify
Sound Cloud
Consent to display content from - Sound
Join our Team

Discover more from STANDFOR

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading